I am going to be as direct as I can. I don't need to waste time with an empty
promise list just to try and inspire someone who doesn't know me or is on the
fence, to vote. Here are the things I wanna see happen:
IMAGE OF THE BOARD: Who is the
board? ( I dunno? I think they are the ones that spam us with election stuff
but I can't name a single one of them!):
Until last year, when Wim Remes got elected to the board I did not know
the name of one ISC(2) board member. That's a pretty big problem to me. It is
much akin to people not knowing who a senator is or a governor or even the
mayor. For a body that has control over my certification and has the ability to
take it away, I would think I should know who the board members are. Moreover,
If I don't know who they are, how can I know they are acting in my best
interest as a certificate holder? In this same breath, I'd like to ask "If I
don't know them and I don't know what they are doing, and out of the 80k+
CISSPs that are certified, what if only 2500 vote?" This is a
massive issue. I am not real comfortable saying 3%
is an "ok" majority to determine the leaders. The problem here isn't just "how
do we get more people to vote", but how do we get people to see that voting
will matter and their vote will count for something. All of this boils down to
the feeling that I have had since I got my CISSP. To me the board has always
been this "Ivory Tower" organization with little or no connection to the
community at large practicing InfoSec on a daily basis. THIS MUST CHANGE. It
can't only change for the vote to actually represent the people but it must
change to increase the value of the certification in the first place. CISSPs
all over the world need names and faces of people they can go to when all else
fails. The marketing and FAQs on the site are a great start, but it is time we
take a bit more pride in this community. No more hiding behind
the curtain. If you are a Board member, I am calling every one of you to the
mat to prove YOU are going to make a difference. If you think that is going to
take too much time or impede your life (since this is a volunteer position)
then guess what?.Gracefully bow out and let someone willing to take the hands
on approach that most seem to have cowered away from.
Resolutions:
Well, this one is going to take a lot of work from each individual board
member. People are going to have to figure out how "IN" they really are. I'll
tell you this, I will have an email address set up and in many cases will be
happy to give you my cell phone number if there is something I think I can do
to help change. Hell, I'd like to set up a monthly town hall meeting to hear
what's going on in the CISSP world around the globe and get some actual
feedback from those of you in the trenches every day. I don't want some survey
company or form, I want to talk to REAL people with REAL issues and have them
be on the docket for the board to attempt to address. ***"Oh Chris, you are
creating so much work!"** * Tough shit. Life is hard. No more free passes! Name
and signature on the line y'all?. It's long since time for the board to do some
WORK for this organization!
Transparency: What
does the board do?
Well, they make rules? I think? Or they decide how money is spent? Um? Or they
make test questions? Or they decide how ISC(2) will stay in business? Maybe
they ... um?. Uuhhh?. Forget it?.
"The (ISC)² Board of Directors is comprised of information security
professionals from around the world representing academia, private
organizations and government agencies. All volunteers and (ISC)²-certified, the
Board provides governance and oversight for the organization, grants
certifications to qualifying candidates and enforces adherence to the (ISC)²
Code of Ethics."
Well, that's what they say they do. How? Magic I'd imagine. There
is little to no mention (unless you dig for hours) on how this governance works
or even the real objectives. Again, NOT ACCEPTABLE. I firmly believe that this
organization that is there to provide governance and oversight should have
transparency at all levels. Without the ability for members to see how those
principals are being carried out, we are being governed by an absentee tyrant.
If the organization attempts to have a pseudo democracy then they need to
follow some of the basic tenants of a democratic process. Democracyweb says it
best:
"In a democracy, the principle of accountability holds that government
officials, whether elected or appointed by those who have been elected, are
responsible to the citizenry for their decisions and actions. Transparency
requires that the decisions and actions of those in government are open to
public scrutiny and that the public has a right to access such information.
Both concepts are central to the very idea of democratic governance. Without
accountability and transparency, democracy is impossible. In their absence,
elections and the notion of the will of the people have no meaning, and
government has the potential to become arbitrary and self-serving."
So why am I so hot on this topic? Well, a simple Google search will let
you know how "transparent" the org is. How many CISSPs are there in the world
(69,489 in August, 2010, but why no numbers available since)? What is the
budget? How are their dues spent/allocated? What is the 1 year plan? 3 year
plan? 5 year? How about a basic value proposition? Anything??? I am sure it's
out there somewhere but it is not easy to find and THAT unto itself shows the
lack of transparency that exists. This is an organization that took in US$9.827
million in 2010; what did they do with that money to add value to our
certification, and more importantly, our security community?
Resolutions:
* Create an open and publically viewable accounting ledger. I'd love to see
where my certification money goes and I am sure you would as well! * Live
meetings: The senate and house have been doing this for years. Why can't the
board give a live feed into their meetings? What secrets are told behind the
closed doors. I am sure there are things that are competitive (thought I don't
know the competitor too well) or trade secret info, and I can dig why those
things have to be in private, but EVERYTHING? Come on! Let's be a little less
shady and show as a board that we are dealing with some of the issues/concerns
of certificate holders. Let's even let em watch!! Imagine that? We can have
town hall meetings and feedback forms.. THEN you could see them actually being
discussed?! Crazy?!
Community involvement:
I don't need a cocktail party once a year at some conference I wouldn't attend
in the first place. That doesn't help me. It doesn't show me your value, it
shows me that you are trying to buy my love. No thanks. How about we
reinvigorate the local groups? How about we spend that money on continuing
education instead of Hors d'oeuvre. How about we start INVESTING the money back
into the community instead of lining another hotel pocket? After starting
BSides with an amazing crew of passionate InfoSec people, I learned that it is
not how much you spend, rather it's how much work you put into it. Again, hard
work and dedication is gonna bring this one to a close. Not just buying me off
with a crappy well drink and a preso about how much other stuff ISC(2) is doing
to promote a new certification. Just imagine if we could inject a little of the
BSides love into the org? Free conferences, seminars, workshops, and people
getting together because they share a passion for the industry, not just to
have their cheesepuff and bounce before the preso starts. The CISSP community
has a wealth of TALENT AND EXPERIENCE. Let's tap into it instead of tapping it
out.
Resolutions:
- Sponsored/free events
- Increased education
- Networking connections and career enablement
- ISC career center? A place to help get work/skills and move forward in the
profession
- Working on reinvigorating the energy of the organization ( which to me, has
been coasting on its laurels for a LONG time (10+ years).
- Providing a mentorship program for perspective and present members
- Increasing the value of the certifications through clear definition of
their purpose
- Overhaul the CBK to emphasize Current
Further, tear down of the "Good Ole boy's club". There are more CISSPs than
ever before and many of the board members have been in a seat for YEARS! Some
of them have even been a president before. Where has It gotten us? To a place
where respected professional are willing to burn their cert in protest because
the board doesn't have a connection to the InfoSec industry of today. It is a
different world out there, and the lack of real world and relevant RECENT
experience is driving the reputation into the ground.
While this may come across as a rant, I am simply calling it like I see
it. I own a company, I'm not afraid to get fired, and I am sure as hell not
afraid to speak my mind. Guess what? I'll prolly swear, get emotional, make a
fuss, and talk out of turn. I'll also be the first one to cheer over any small
win that is had. This is a passionate field and there is no place anymore for
an exclusively formal process. Security is a feeling.. time to have
some.
If you want to know more, or add to the things that need to change, or
just chat about what is going to happen moving forward, please reach out to me.
If you think that some of the things that I am talking about resonate with you
and want me on your side then I humbly ask for your signature in the petition
to allow me to run for the board and your vote when it comes time.
To support the petition, please send me an email from your ISC(2)
registered address requesting my name to be added to the election ballot, along
with your CISSP# as these are required per board rules. Please send this
to:
cnickerson@isc4thepeople.com
by September 17, 2012.
You can also reach out to me on twitter to start a discussion about
improving the ISC(2):
@isc4thepeople or @indi303
Remember, there are FOUR board spots open
this year, and if you REALLY want to see change, there are others that are
running for the board that come from a similar background and idea
level!
I implore you to check them out and give them your vote to make our change
as dramatic and swift as possible:
Dave Lewis
@gattaca <http://twitter.com/gattaca>
Vote for Dave
<http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/vote-for-dave/>
votedave@liquidmatrix.org
Scot Terban
@krypt3ia <http://twitter.com/krypt3ia>
ISC2 Board
Candidacy<https://krypt3ia.wordpress.com/2012/08/23/isc2-board-candidacy/>
drkrypt3ia@gmail.com
Boris Sverdlik
@jadedsecurity
<http://twitter.com/jadedsecurity>
Vote for Boris
<http://jadedsecurity.net/2012/08/22/isc2-bod-vote-2012/>
isc2board@jadedsecurity.com